Regulatory Clarity as a Catalyst for Institutional Crypto Adoption
In 2025, regulatory progress across key markets moved decisively from ambiguity toward implementation. Rather than constraining activity, these frameworks have begun to formalize legal foundations required for the next phase of global crypto adoption, in our view.
In the United States, the rescission of SAB 121 and the passage of the GENIUS Act marked a meaningful shift. Banks are no longer penalized for holding digital assets on balance sheets, opening the door for regulated custody, settlement, and treasury services.
At the same time, stablecoins have been classified outside securities law, with clear reserve and disclosure requirements tied to cash and short dated U.S. Treasuries. This has enabled compliant stablecoins to integrate directly into core payment infrastructure, accelerating their use in settlement, payroll, and institutional cash management.
Europe has advanced in parallel through MiCA, which introduced a harmonized regulatory regime for crypto asset issuance and services across all member states. Beyond compliance, MiCA has materially reoriented activity toward regulated instruments and venues, as non-compliant issuers are progressively sidelined.
This has driven professionalization across reserve management, disclosure, and governance, while encouraging liquidity to consolidate around compliant stablecoins and platforms. For institutional participants, the result is greater legal certainty for cross border spot activity, collateral usage, and onchain settlement within the EU, reducing operational risk and enabling participation at scale.
The United Kingdom has taken a more incremental approach, but with similar directionality. The proposed stablecoin and custody rulebooks, alongside dedicated prudential regimes for crypto firms, are aligning crypto market infrastructure with banking standards for safeguarding, capital, and risk management. The result is a clearer path for UK regulated venues to support institutional flows.
Building on this trend, the United Arab Emirates has emerged as a key hub for digital assets and stablecoins. Dubai's VARA has tightened leverage and formalized token issuance standards, while Abu Dhabi's ADGM has streamlined approvals, introduced activity-based capital rules, and prohibited privacy and algorithmic stablecoins. Together, these regimes establish a predictable, institutional grade framework for cross border trading, custody, and stablecoin and RWA issuance.
Across jurisdictions, the common thread is operational usability rather than permissiveness. Stablecoins are becoming embedded within payment, settlement, and treasury workflows, while custody, surveillance, and capital standards align with institutional norms. These frameworks establish the legal and operational prerequisites for issuing, settling, and holding tokenized instruments within regulated market structures.
Looking into 2026, the main risk is not a reversal of this progress, but uneven implementation and compliance costs across regions. For institutional investors, the key questions will be where regulated liquidity concentrates, how capital rules treat tokenized collateral, and how quickly large banks and payment providers integrate stablecoins and tokenized assets into their operating models.
Disclaimer
This communication is for information purposes only and is not an advertisement, an offer, invitation or a solicitation to buy or sell securities or investment products, an official confirmation of any kind and is not intended as investment advice or recommendation. Before making an investment decision, investors should ensure they have sufficient information to ascertain the legal, financial, tax and regulatory consequences of an investment to enable them to make an informed investment decision. The information in this communication is subject to change without notice. No warranty is made as to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in this communication, and the information in this email may be erroneous, invalid and/or unsubstantiated. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors, omissions or adverse consequences in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission or for any other reason.
The performance and value of any financial product may fluctuate and may be subject to sudden and large movements that could result in a loss equal to or in excess of the amount invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. The presented figures are based on estimates, assumptions, models and third-party data, any or all of which may prove to be inaccurate.