Weekly Crypto Market News: DeFi Infrastructure, Regulation & Capital Flows
_December 22 – 28, 2025 _
Activity spans banking, perps, stablecoin payments, prediction markets, and Bitcoin-native ecosystems, but does not converge into a single, defensible theme.
Solana introduced gasless transactions, enabling apps to sponsor fees and abstract UX friction for end users.
BNB Chain announced plans to launch a native stablecoin to support payments, DeFi liquidity, and onchain settlement.
A Movement based blockchain migrated from an L2 to a standalone Move based Layer 1 with a dedicated validator set, native MOVE staking, and support for Move 2.0, targeting 10k plus TPS.
Governance approved protocol fee activation with a 100M UNI burn; interface fees to be captured by Uniswap Labs, LP economics unchanged.
Added Anchorage Digital as a USDe custodian, increasing regulatory oversight and custody diversification.
GMX went live on Ethereum mainnet, enabling perp trading, spot swaps, and liquidity provision without bridging.
Reduced perp funding rates by applying a 0.5 scaling factor to Hyperliquid’s funding formula, lowering baseline funding to ~5.5 percent annualized.
Assistance Fund HYPE formally recognized as burned following validator vote, reducing circulating and total supply.
Executed a hard fork to recover funds from the Balancer exploit, removing assets from attacker control.
Launched a delta neutral Altcoin Cluster starting with HYPE and SOL, fully hedged via Binance and Hyperliquid and targeting 10–15 percent neutral yields.
Token sale raised $923K for 5% of supply, falling short of target amid high FDV and weak holiday demand.
According to [Tokenomist](https://tokenomist.ai/" \t "_blank):
Introduced a three-point airdrop framework tied to lending activity, protocol usage, and community engagement, with 15% of supply allocated to TGE rewards.
oDOLO emissions activated for suppliers across multiple assets including USDC, ETH, WBTC, and stablecoins.
Trust Wallet’s Chrome extension experienced a security failure that allowed attackers to drain roughly USD 7 million in user funds over the Christmas period. The incident was limited to desktop extension users on a compromised version, but it raised broader questions around browser wallet risk, software supply chains, and how far CeFi parents will back “self‑custody” products.
The breach originated from a malicious release of Trust Wallet’s Chrome extension (v2.68), pushed via a leaked Chrome Web Store API key that let an attacker bypass normal publishing controls. Once installed, the modified code accessed users’ recovery phrases after they unlocked or imported wallets, decrypted them using the local password, and exfiltrated keys to an external server.
With seed phrases compromised, attackers could recreate wallets and systematically empty assets across chains, routing funds through exchanges and bridges to obfuscate flows. Trust Wallet responded by shipping v2.69, removing the malicious logic, adding detection banners for affected wallets, and instructing users to rotate keys and abandon exposed addresses.
Direct user impact centers on approximately USD 7 million in stolen assets and a surge of more than 2,600 compensation claims, far above Trust Wallet’s normal support load. Affected users face forced wallet migration, operational disruption, and elevated phishing risk as attackers and impersonators target the incident’s publicity.
Binance, as Trust Wallet’s owner, has committed to reimbursing losses via its protection reserves while the wallet team operates a structured claims and verification process. The response helps contain reputational damage but also reinforces that browser extensions are a structurally weaker surface than hardware or mobile wallets, which may drive user funds toward more security‑focused custody setups and raise the bar for wallet release governance across the ecosystem.
On December 26, Solstice’s native stablecoin USX experienced a sharp dislocation in secondary markets, briefly trading as low as $0.74 on Solana DEXs including Orca and Raydium. The was driven by sell orders that materially exceeded available on-chain depth.
Price action was confined to secondary markets. There was no evidence of protocol insolvency, collateral impairment, or NAV deterioration. However, the severity of the move exposed weaknesses in the way USX’s peg defense mechanisms function under stress.
USX is designed to maintain its peg through a combination of balance sheet backing, market maker liquidity, and primary market redemptions at par. In normal conditions, discounted USX should be arbitraged back to $1 by participants buying on DEXs and redeeming through primary channels.
In practice, this mechanism failed for two reasons:
As a result, USX traded purely on secondary market supply and demand during the event. Stabilization only occurred once Solstice and its market making partners injected liquidity directly into affected pools.
Despite the severity of the price dislocation, all available evidence indicates that USX remained solvent throughout the episode. Solstice stated that protocol collateral was unaffected, which was corroborated by Accountable, an independent verification provider, which published an out-of-cycle proof of solvency snapshot during the event:
All reserves were fully verifiable
The USX volatility occurred against the backdrop of Solstice’s SLX public token sale, compounding scrutiny at an already sensitive moment.
The SLX sale was structured to distribute up to 5% of total token supply at a valuation implying roughly $130 million FDV. The stated goal was not fundraising necessity but broader distribution to long-term aligned holders, with Solstice emphasizing that the protocol is fully funded internally and supported by Deus X Capital.
Demand for the sale was weaker than expected. The allocation did not fully clear, and unsold tokens from the public allocation are expected to return to the Solstice treasury rather than being redistributed.
Following the sale, Solstice announced several changes:
A key source of community backlash stemmed not from solvency concerns, but from asymmetric access during the depeg. During the dislocation:
There is no disclosed evidence that Solstice or its market makers profited from buying discounted USX and redeeming at NAV. However, the structure itself allows for that outcome in theory, which is sufficient to damage trust in open markets.
This dynamic highlights a broader tension in institutional-styled stablecoins operating on public blockchains. Permissioned redemption models can function well in calm conditions, but under stress they introduce:
Disclaimer
This communication is for information purposes only and is not an advertisement, an offer, invitation or a solicitation to buy or sell securities or investment products, an official confirmation of any kind and is not intended as investment advice or recommendation. Before making an investment decision, investors should ensure they have sufficient information to ascertain the legal, financial, tax and regulatory consequences of an investment to enable them to make an informed investment decision. The information in this communication is subject to change without notice. No warranty is made as to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in this communication, and the information in this email may be erroneous, invalid and/or unsubstantiated. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors, omissions or adverse consequences in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission or for any other reason.
The performance and value of any financial product may fluctuate and may be subject to sudden and large movements that could result in a loss equal to or in excess of the amount invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. The presented figures are based on estimates, assumptions, models and third-party data, any or all of which may prove to be inaccurate.
