
Weekly updatesDec 29, 2025
Weekly Market Outlook | Dec 29 - 31, 2025
Edge Capital’s weekly assessment of geopolitical risk, capital flows, protocol developments, and market structure across digital assets
Weekly Crypto Market News: DeFi Infrastructure, Regulation & Capital Flows
January 12 – 18, 2026
Edge Capital’s weekly assessment of crypto markets, regulation, capital flows, and protocol developments across digital assets.
Headline: 29 projects raised $333M total.
Dango launched its mainnet alpha, introducing a new onchain trading venue focused on low latency execution and composable market primitives.
Kinetiq launched a new perpetuals DEX with an orderbook based design targeting high frequency onchain trading.
Jupiter activated incentives for JupUSD, its native stablecoin, to bootstrap adoption across lending and liquidity venues.
Superlend released V2 with improved capital efficiency, isolated risk markets, and enhanced liquidation mechanics.
Optimism initiated OP buybacks using protocol revenue as part of its long term token alignment strategy.
Lighter released its mobile application, extending access to its perps and trading stack beyond desktop.
X banned InfoFi related content, impacting distribution and visibility for onchain financial data platforms.
Mezo opened registration ahead of its token launch, enabling users to qualify through protocol usage and participation.
DAO governed treasury launched to allocate capital across robotics focused onchain and offchain markets.
According to Tokenomist:
Fogo launched its airdrop checker as part of its token rollout process following mainnet genesis.
Coinbase has withdrawn support for the Senate’s draft crypto market structure bill, arguing the current text is worse than the status quo. CEO Brian Armstrong highlighted concerns around tokenized equities, DeFi, stablecoins, and agency balance, and said he would rather see no law than a flawed framework. The move came just before a scheduled markup, contributing to a postponement and underscoring how critical industry backing has become for moving complex digital asset legislation.
Coinbase’s main objections center on substantive design features of the bill, not on the concept of federal crypto legislation itself. The draft is criticized for effectively banning tokenized equities, introducing restrictive language on DeFi, expanding government access to user financial data, and curbing stablecoin rewards in ways that favor banks over crypto platforms.
From Coinbase’s perspective, the bill also mishandles the division of labor between the SEC and CFTC. Critics argue it would erode CFTC authority over core market‑structure questions while reinforcing a more enforcement‑driven SEC regime, blunting one of the industry’s key reasons for supporting legislation in the first place. This combination turns what was meant to be a clarity exercise into a perceived tightening of constraints on tokenization, DeFi, and yield‑bearing stablecoin products.
In the near term, Coinbase’s stance reduces the probability of a quick compromise and has already contributed to delaying committee action, suggesting a slower path for comprehensive federal crypto rules. This keeps large U.S. exchanges and DeFi participants operating under overlapping enforcement‑first frameworks, discouraging aggressive product innovation in areas like tokenized securities and consumer stablecoin yields.
At the structural level, the episode leaves the SEC–CFTC boundary unsettled, with no durable settlement on which tokens sit where, and under what standards. For markets, that means continued jurisdictional risk embedded in U.S. listings, product design, and cross‑border flows, with global venues and non‑U.S. regulators gaining relative influence as Washington’s legislative process stalls.
Dubai’s financial regulator has formally prohibited privacy-focused cryptocurrencies from regulated exchanges operating within the Dubai International Financial Centre. The ruling, issued by the Dubai Financial Services Authority and effective January 12, bans trading, promotion, and fund activity involving privacy tokens such as Monero and Zcash on DIFC-licensed platforms. The restriction applies to regulated financial services only. Individuals remain permitted to hold privacy assets in private wallets outside regulated venues.
The DFSA cited anti-money-laundering and sanctions compliance risks as the basis for the ban. Privacy tokens and related tools, including mixers such as Tornado Cash, were explicitly referenced due to their transaction-obfuscation features. The policy reflects a regulatory preference for traceability and auditability within supervised financial systems, while stopping short of prohibiting private ownership or peer-to-peer use.
The decision reopens a broader debate over privacy and regulation in crypto markets. At a December roundtable hosted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Crypto Task Force, Commissioner Hester Peirce argued that privacy should not be treated as an inherent signal of criminal activity and that financial surveillance frameworks may need to evolve as digital asset adoption grows. Scrutiny of privacy tools has intensified since the 2025 conviction of Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm, raising unresolved questions around legal liability for developers of open-source, non-custodial software.
The episode highlights a persistent structural tension in digital asset markets. As regulated venues increasingly exclude privacy-preserving assets to meet compliance standards, demand continues to express itself through price performance and unregulated channels. The result is a growing divergence between where institutions are permitted to operate and where market interest remains strongest, reinforcing the trade-off between regulatory clarity and the original privacy ethos of crypto networks.
Disclaimer
This communication is for information purposes only and is not an advertisement, an offer, invitation or a solicitation to buy or sell securities or investment products, an official confirmation of any kind and is not intended as investment advice or recommendation. Before making an investment decision, investors should ensure they have sufficient information to ascertain the legal, financial, tax and regulatory consequences of an investment to enable them to make an informed investment decision. The information in this communication is subject to change without notice. No warranty is made as to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in this communication, and the information in this email may be erroneous, invalid and/or unsubstantiated. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors, omissions or adverse consequences in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission or for any other reason.
The performance and value of any financial product may fluctuate and may be subject to sudden and large movements that could result in a loss equal to or in excess of the amount invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. The presented figures are based on estimates, assumptions, models and third-party data, any or all of which may prove to be inaccurate.